Roundcube Community Forum

SVN Releases => Issues & Bugs => Topic started by: ihug on July 30, 2007, 08:13:27 PM

Title: Sponsorship for specific bug-fixes
Post by: ihug on July 30, 2007, 08:13:27 PM
I work for an ISP in New Zealand, and we're (somewhat bravely) using RoundCube as our public-facing webmail service.

We've had lots of feedback from our customers, and while many see RoundCube as a great improvement on our old webmail system, a minority have had problems, and a few are so upset they're even threatening to close their accounts.

We have some in-house developers, but they lack experience in the product so they can't yet provide sufficiently rapid responses.

So we have a financial interest in seeing the project advanced as quickly as possible, and therefore are willing to offer sponsorship either to the project as a whole, or to individuals if needs be.


The issues we need immediate assistance with include:
Obviously we'd be delighted if some of them are already fixed, or are simply a matter of configuration.

Which form of payment would people see as being more appropriate: sponsorship to the project, or payment to individuals? And what is the going rate? (We're expecting somewhere around 100-500 Euros per bug, but hourly rates would also be considered.)

Reply here, or by email to [email protected].
Title: Re: Sponsorship for specific bug-fixes
Post by: Florianer on July 31, 2007, 02:40:10 AM
Quote from: Martin Kealey
  • on a new message, can't add a recipient from the address book

Hi,
as far as I know, in composing a new message you cannot open the addressbook and see all the contacts, but it is possible to 'access' the contacts. Start typing email or a part of the full name / surname, a list of all contacts matching to this typed in part will appear. Hope, that helps, but I guess you would like to see the addressbook to browse trough all the contacts...
Title: Re: Sponsorship for specific bug-fixes
Post by: kmn on July 31, 2007, 06:55:37 AM
Hello,

It is possible to see all the contacts from the address book. You have to set the no. of records in the personal preferences higher depending on the number of contacts. By default it is 40.

kmn
Title: Re: Sponsorship for specific bug-fixes
Post by: ihug on August 01, 2007, 09:36:47 PM
Quote from: Florianer [when] composing a new message you cannot open the addressbook [...] but it is possible to 'access' the contacts. Start typing email or a part of the full name / surname, a list of all contacts matching to this typed in part will appear.

That was pretty much what I was after, thank-you.

And to see "everyone", it suffices to search for "@", since every address has to have one of those. :)
Title: Re: Sponsorship for specific bug-fixes
Post by: kmn on August 04, 2007, 01:29:11 AM
Glad it helped you Martin.

But beware, this makes page loading slower. So your users who are on slower connections may start complaining about "slow mail". Tell them this is a trade-off between convenience and speed.

I have rolled out RC in a semi production environment (very bravely, as you have said, but crossing my fingers) on a beta basis. Around 500 users. Not many problems so far. But there are some really bad problems/lack of features with the existing SVN. I am sure your users are also going to come back to you with these problems.

1. Opening attachments is a real hassle. It is good to have (a) "download attchment" link near each attachment and (b) "download all attachments" for multiple attachments. There is a modification in the forums for (a) suggested by a user, but it does not work with the SVN. I think (b) has been accepted in the trac. Could you have a look at (a). The forum link is
http://roundcubeforum.net/forum/index.php?topic=780.msg3349#msg3349

2. If a user deletes his lone default identity, he is no more able to send messages. It is necessary to prevent users from deleting his lone identity. I have for the timebeing disabled the identitities tab for preventing this.

I see that you have mentioned you have some developers with you. Could you consider looking into some of these very essential modifications for the code, which you could contribute to the community.


kmn
Title: Re: Sponsorship for specific bug-fixes
Post by: ihug on August 05, 2007, 07:23:34 AM
Quote from: kmn But beware, this makes page loading slower. So your users who are on slower connections may start complaining about "slow mail". Tell them this is a trade-off between convenience and speed.

We don't plan to let them have large address books anyway. :)

QuoteI have rolled out RC in a semi production environment (very bravely, as you have said, but crossing my fingers) on a beta basis. Around 500 users.

How do I tell how many real users we have?

mysql> select count(distinct username) from users;
+--------------------------+
| count(distinct username) |
+--------------------------+
|          138884 |
+--------------------------+
1 row in set (2.92 sec)

QuoteNot many problems so far. But there are some really bad problems/lack of features with the existing SVN. I am sure your users are also going to come back to you with these problems.

1. Opening attachments is a real hassle.
2. If a user deletes his lone default identity, he is no more able to send messages.

We've had some users report problems with vanished attachments; some sort of fix would be useful.

I don't think most of our users are sophisticated enough to "fiddle" with anything labelled "settings", but no doubt someone will do it (and complain) soon.

QuoteI see that you have mentioned you have some developers with you. Could you consider looking into some of these very essential modifications for the code, which you could contribute to the community.

Neither I nor our other developers are yet familiar enough to debug things, let alone write patches. We have some good general-skills programmers, but things like Ajax are still foreign territory and so it'll take us a while to get up to speed.

If someone would be willing to spend a bit of time nursing us in the right direction, we'd very much appreciate it. We're in UTC+12 so an email conversation spaced out over days is rather frustrating; I don't suppose any senior developers would be willing to take a phone call?