Roundcube Community Forum

Themes & Styling => Theme Releases => Topic started by: youds on July 09, 2010, 12:11:12 PM

Title: mVision 2.3 Released
Post by: youds on July 09, 2010, 12:11:12 PM
[size=+2]mVision 2.3 Pre Release[/size]
[size=+1]CLICK TO BUY (http://store.roundcubethemes.net/order/index.php?task=product&product_id=1&category_id=1)[/size]

The mVision 2.3 theme3 has been re-released under a commercial license. Hope you like it!

Features

Screenshots

For a complete set of screenshots, click here (http://store.roundcubethemes.net/order/index.php?task=product&product_id=1&category_id=1).

Compatibility

The theme is compatible with:
Further Updates

As RoundCube 0.4 is still in beta stage, you will be able to re-download the mVision 2.3 free of charge when RoundCube goes into stable. This will include updates to the features of the theme and compatibility fixes.

Planned updates
Email display: when in Threads mode, display the odd / even styling in keeping with the email list when threads are closed. See this ticket.
Languages: multiple images folders with dynamic language selection
These will be available when RoundCube 0.4 goes stable. (they are waiting on the Roundcube Developers)

Purchasing

To purchase this theme, please visit http://store.roundcubethemes.net (http://store.roundcubethemes.net/order/index.php?task=product&product_id=1&category_id=1). The theme is priced at £15 with bulk purchase options.

Support

Please do not post support requests as replies. There is a knowledge base here (http://store.roundcubethemes.net/kb/) and support is being provided via emails sent to support at roundcubethemes.net. Replies may not be read.
Title: mVision 2.3 Released
Post by: oldschool on July 09, 2010, 08:48:32 PM
Has anyone of the RC-Team been asked to allow this?


Rgds.
Title: mVision 2.3 Released
Post by: corbosman on July 10, 2010, 06:09:22 AM
why would they need to allow this?  it's perfectly valid for anyone to charge for a theme, even if that theme is based on GPL software.

Im not a GPL expert at all, but the way I understand it, anyone can make a theme, and any CSS or artwork may be redistributed under a different license, even a commercial one.

But, if mvision has any PHP or Javascript in it, those pieces must be released under GPL as well. So they cant release any PHP or JS under their commercial license. If the mvision theme has any JS or PHP and those bits arent GPL, they may be violating the GPL license.  (think language packs, that are all PHP).
Title: mVision 2.3 Released
Post by: gege2061 on July 19, 2010, 02:35:54 PM
In my opinion, it's the same problem with wordpress and the theme Thesis: you can sale a creation but it must be under the GPL license.
Title: mVision 2.3 Released
Post by: corbosman on July 19, 2010, 03:56:39 PM
I dont agree :) Only part of the creation should be under GPL. If you design images, logos, icons, whatever, they can be under whatever license you want.

But I do think any derivative PHP/JS should be under GPL, so anyone that buys a theme should theoretically be able to distribute those parts along. Kinda useless without icons etc, but ..
Title: mVision 2.3 Released
Post by: rainchainsdirect on July 20, 2010, 10:35:17 AM
nice informations
Title: mVision 2.3 Released
Post by: oldschool on July 20, 2010, 10:56:14 AM
1. The usage of the name of RoundCube (f.e. inside of the domain name).
2. The design is taken from a commercial product.
3. The useage of not free fonts.
and so on and on...

Here we call it "Trittbrettfahrer".

RC is great.
Making a theme is hard work. I know that. I did that, too.

Final: For me it feels like a kick in the *** of the community.
Or is anyone of the RC team involved?


Rgds.
Title: mVision 2.3 Released
Post by: corbosman on July 22, 2010, 04:56:52 PM
This may be relevant for the mvision author:

Slashdot Your Rights Online Story | WordPress Creator GPL Says WP Template Must Be GPL'd (http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/22/1935248/WordPress-Creator-GPL-Says-WP-Template-Must-Be-GPLd)