Roundcube Community Forum

Release Support => Release Discussion => Topic started by: robertut on September 16, 2010, 10:46:11 AM

Title: No difference between List and Threads view
Post by: robertut on September 16, 2010, 10:46:11 AM
Hello all!

I have RC 0.4 installed on my Ubuntu box, running with dovecot 1.2.9. All seem fine, however, I see  no difference between List and Threads view. They both show as list.

My dovecot instance supports threading:
telnet localhost 143
Trying ::1...
Trying 127.0.1.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN] Dovecot ready.
1 capability
* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT IDLE CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH QUOTA STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN
1 OK Capability completed.


The imap log in case of List view:
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: C: sel1 SELECT "INBOX"
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted.
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * 11 EXISTS
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * 0 RECENT
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * OK [UNSEEN 11] First unseen.
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1284574780] UIDs valid
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * OK [UIDNEXT 61] Predicted next UID
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 1] Highest
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: sel1 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed.
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: C: fuid FETCH 11 (UID)
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * 11 FETCH (UID 60)
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: fuid OK Fetch completed.
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: C: s SORT (DATE) US-ASCII ALL
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * SORT 6 8 5 7 1 2 3 4 9 10 11
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: s OK Sort completed (0.000 secs).
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: C: FH12 FETCH 6,8,5,7,1,2,3,4,9,10,11 (UID RFC822.SIZE FLAGS INTERNALDATE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM TO SUBJECT
 REPLY-TO IN-REPLY-TO CC BCC CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING CONTENT-TYPE MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES DISPOSITION-NOTIFICATION-TO X-PRIORITY X-DRAFT-INFO)])
[16-Sep-2010 16:04:48 +0200]: S: * 1 FETCH (UID 1 RFC822.SIZE 6401 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "15-Sep-2010 20:23:48 +0200" BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE F
ROM TO SUBJECT REPLY-TO IN-REPLY-TO CC BCC CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING CONTENT-TYPE MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES DISPOSITION-NOTIFICATION-TO X-PRIORITY X-DRAF
T-INFO)] {221}


The imap log in case of Threads view:
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: C: sel1 SELECT "INBOX"
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted.
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * 11 EXISTS
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * 0 RECENT
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * OK [UNSEEN 11] First unseen.
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1284574780] UIDs valid
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * OK [UIDNEXT 61] Predicted next UID
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 1] Highest
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: sel1 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed.
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: C: thrd1 THREAD REFS US-ASCII ALL
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * THREAD (6)(8)(5)(7)(1)(2)(3)(4)(9)(10)(11)
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: thrd1 OK Thread completed.
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: C: fuid FETCH 11 (UID)
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * 11 FETCH (UID 60)
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: fuid OK Fetch completed.
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: C: FH12 FETCH 11,10,9,4,3,2,1,7,5,8,6 (UID RFC822.SIZE FLAGS INTERNALDATE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM TO SUBJECT
 REPLY-TO IN-REPLY-TO CC BCC CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING CONTENT-TYPE MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES DISPOSITION-NOTIFICATION-TO X-PRIORITY X-DRAFT-INFO)])
[16-Sep-2010 16:05:36 +0200]: S: * 1 FETCH (UID 1 RFC822.SIZE 6401 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "15-Sep-2010 20:23:48 +0200" BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE F
ROM TO SUBJECT REPLY-TO IN-REPLY-TO CC BCC CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING CONTENT-TYPE MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES DISPOSITION-NOTIFICATION-TO X-PRIORITY X-DRAF
T-INFO)] {221}


Both threads and list view look the same, alhtough I had several e-mail replies back and forth between this and an external account, which is supposed to generate a threading list.

Any idea what should I do?
Title: No difference between List and Threads view
Post by: alec on September 16, 2010, 01:32:00 PM
Roundcube displays what your server returns. There are no threads in the response. Threads view is not the same as conversation view.