Author Topic: Reply-to problem  (Read 3205 times)

Offline SoukoussMan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Reply-to problem
« on: March 02, 2007, 03:53:09 AM »
I've a problem this the reply-to in the Roundcube current version.
With my procmail i add a reply-to in any email.
When i received a mail where procmail have add the reply-to, when i want reply by roundcube, the to field is empty.
If i test to reply with by imap with my evolution mail reader, the reply-to is correctly use in the reply.

I've test to send me a email ( not modify by the procmail ) with my evolution mail reader with a reply-to. When i respond this mail in roundcube, the reply-to is correctly use in the reply.

In resume :

When i reply by roundcube
- Mail without reply-to from anywhere => TO FIELD OK
- Mail with reply-to add by procmail => TO FIELD NOT OK
- Mail with reply-to add by a mail client ( evolution ) => TO FIELD OK
When i reply by imap with mail client ( evolution )
- Mail without reply-to from anywhere => TO FIELD OK
- Mail with reply-to add by procmail => TO FIELD OK
- Mail with reply-to add by mail client (evolution ) => TO FIELD OK

In consequently, i think that is a bug in roundcube! no ?

The email source with reply-to add by procmail :
Quote
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: soukoussman@destinationdomain.fr
Delivered-To: soukoussman@destinationdomain.fr
Received: from localhost (zeus [127.0.0.1])
   by zeus.destinationdomain.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4558A11701F4
   for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:42:43 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at destinationdomain.fr
X-Spam-Score: 0.629
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.629 tagged_above=-100 required=4.31
   tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHORT_LENGTH=0.629, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from zeus.destinationdomain.fr ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (zeus.destinationdomain.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id VmJKleAj3+uS for ;
   Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:42:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169])
   by zeus.destinationdomain.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EF111700B5
   for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:42:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so605714ugf
    for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:42:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=gmail.com; s=beta;
    h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
    b=R1XMSgVClDjBvx0/BMgSpFM0gdLFxbW7HHKqqoWMynfKV4kvPOLFi/edNJWpJJIBgmcAnU74UydUn0fLpqEmDwkmZQIqaM2QWEgqKjq8eYoI2YtU4PcRy9e/j2vMAVprccR9CKDVgV8JcB6drjF1bmzKkHb2WVvaayx0aGKav5A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
    d=gmail.com; s=beta;
    h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
    b=b2XBLdmTQMdjSyHe0CE0/tYxN12FFiFFbUWZk9L6eZlmSObHBpVYjHnR3oWdU9zxArAaEOHMkrOH3f3z6xyM/Ezplhcwh4r0eNc1BZg/GOBZw5n2Blrhvn5uKPLjWe/KdLHtw+OPPpypncoOFT/BJghzLulKWcYAv+MjIaNRAqY=
Received: by 10.115.54.1 with SMTP id g1mr158807wak.1172824954882;
    Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.191.11 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 00:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50d34e130703020042w6c6a8893r2a94b66cc450b449@mail.sourcedomain.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:42:34 +0100
From: "Moi"
To: soukoussman@destinationdomain.fr
Subject: Test by procmail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
   boundary="----=_Part_83993_19274054.1172824954858"
Reply-To: soukoussman@destinationdomain.org

------=_Part_83993_19274054.1172824954858
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

test


------=_Part_83993_19274054.1172824954858
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

test

------=_Part_83993_19274054.1172824954858--

The email source from evolution without reply-to add by procmail but by evolution :
Quote
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: soukoussman@destinationdomain.fr
Delivered-To: soukoussman@destinationdomain.fr
Received: from localhost (zeus [127.0.0.1])
   by zeus.destinationdomain.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C02811701F4
   for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:43:27 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at destinationdomain.fr
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-100 required=4.31
   tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from zeus.destinationdomain.fr ([127.0.0.1])
   by localhost (zeus.destinationdomain.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
   with ESMTP id iclPmTDQ2pcg for ;
   Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:43:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184])
   by zeus.destinationdomain.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9028F11700B5
   for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:43:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1119239nfe
    for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:43:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=gmail.com; s=beta;
    h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:reply-to:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:from;
    b=H1UoRpJ58D9cn8pSKVNDMEWkCI5XoA9aSDdNbWlx6ZeCRv87Xu+5Fp8yvOsWpNPnUXfkT5zeQVqb8RxniVsx+blW0OTnPETXMN041JskHplnIbgEgw3AVTiIXmJirLbe1lxNubxM9rSufs4zF+ie+W0G3jTwAlppI9d0SA13Bhs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
    d=gmail.com; s=beta;
    h=received:subject:reply-to:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:from;
    b=dHb/OFSxqZtC9BE1ZQGQq7Mp0evSnkUSxlLXyJEbeRsiCJallpuEvUH4gsjJMe44iydBI2SFtO1F2KDu4+SCvgwJeqU7f0tV4Vz9MIlsAH1pQtIKBwS76KUfmk1Ltau36D645e/8j2rc9xscoQNnJsGclO3qtqhx8LdP7bUs0SA=
Received: by 10.48.217.20 with SMTP id p20mr7274587nfg.1172825001133;
    Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.255.255.74? ( [194.2.79.254])
    by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z37sm5821210ikz.2007.03.02.00.43.19;
    Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Subject: test from evolution mail client
Reply-To: testreply-to@test.com
To: soukoussman@destinationdomain.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-83sWZfTf/3cNlmnvecMZ"
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:42:33 +0100
Message-Id: <1172824953.6381.2.camel@guyard.drs.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1
From: Me


--=-83sWZfTf/3cNlmnvecMZ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

test

--=-83sWZfTf/3cNlmnvecMZ
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




 
 


test



--=-83sWZfTf/3cNlmnvecMZ--

Do you know how to resolv this problem ?

Thanks by advance and sorry for my not good english :)

Offline SoukoussMan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Reply-to problem
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2007, 12:37:30 PM »
No reply...
Do you have the same problem when you rewrite header ?

I've test with a mailing list ( mailman ) and i've the same problem.
I think is really problematics...